I will be happy to see eHarmony responding inside their formal web log to an article called “Marriage-Maker states Are Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street log. The WSJ post examines many of the relationship research revealed by dating sites like eHarmony and the methodology always determine such statistics. We spoke somewhat about this subject as well, fourteen days ago if the original WSJ post ended up being published (see Story).
The WSJ post did not turn to kindly in the statistics launched by internet dating sites, and also for the the majority of component I agree with the writer. The general public ought to understand just how these data tend to be produced. Of all of the internet dating sites pointed out when you look at the WSJ post, “eHarmony shines as among the list of much more cautious people”. This is not precisely a glowing document for eHarmony very, they made a decision to post a reply to their blog.
Within the eHarmony article they go into more precisely the way they calculated that their own dating site was in charge of 2percent of marriages in the us, from the 12-month period ending March 2007. Almost all of the details we currently knew about from a previously introduced PDF document called “eHarmony | Harris Interactive 2007 Marriage Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), although blog post really does clean out some more details. Exactly what this blog post really does tv series is actually, eHarmony is wanting become as open and transparent along with their investigation results as it can. I think title “Open telecommunications” may undoubtedly end up being a good choice when it comes to recognized eHarmony blog.
This is actually the full eHarmony reaction to the Wall Street log how they calculate their own wedding statistics. For additional details about this dating internet site, browse our report on eHarmony.